Green roofs might be able to compensate for urban habitat lost at ground level, but there isn’t much information about how well they match ground-based habitats.
Covered with a growing medium and plants, green roofs can benefit a building’s insulation, control storm-water drainage and remove pollution from the air, as well as provide wildlife habitats.
Extensive green roofs might even be able to compensate for urban habitat lost at ground level, but there isn’t much information about how well they match ground-based habitats.
Green roofs’ limited substrate depth and their different micro-climate makes them different from the ground. Careful design might make it possible to create habitats of equal wildlife value on a roof, and it is definitely possible to make green-roof habitats that are more valuable than a traditional non-greened roof.
To find out exactly what effect the shallower substrate would have, the researchers planted a mix of 25 different wildflowers in 1 meter by 1 meter (1m2) wooden frames. Each frame contained either 100mm or 150mm substrate over filter and drainage layers and a PVC membrane, or 150mm substrate laid directly over bare earth. The frames were not watered or fertilized during the experiment.
After three months and five months of seeding, the researchers measured the total number of plants, total number of species, the number of species in flower and seed, and the maximum height.
While they found some differences in results between the two depths of green-roof substrate, there was a much more marked variation between both green-roof treatments and the frames where substrate was laid over bare earth. Deeper substrate can reduce the number of colonizing plant species – in other words, it helps preserve the intended habitat and reduce the risk it will be taken over by self-seeded species, which could be a good thing if your intention is to reproduce a particular ground habitat.
Green roofs are up high, which means plants face different conditions from their companions on the ground. Higher temperatures and stronger wind, among other things, make them more vulnerable to drought. And, no matter how deep their growing medium is, it is unlikely they can be made totally resilient to these conditions.
The researchers point out that, while mulch and moisture-retaining materials can help alleviate this effect, their use will change the habitat from that on the ground. The green roofs are a distinct habitat in their own right and cannot be used as like-for-like substitutes for habitats on the ground without great care.
It is worth considering whether other, cheaper, wildlife friendly alternatives can offer the same or greater benefits to wildlife.
Dry conditions on extensive green roofs can keep habitats at an early stage of development – a stage at which biodiversity and numbers of rare species are often at their highest. A good example of such highly disturbed habitats on the ground are wastelands or brownfield sites, which often represent some of the most important urban habitats in terms of their conservation value.
Green roofs are expensive to fit to existing buildings and, even when incorporated into a building’s original design, the financial and environmental costs of manufacturing and transporting construction materials, membranes, filters and substrates are high. So we need to be confident of the environmental benefits of the completed roof.
The concept of using green roofs as habitats in the sky is a great idea. But we need more research to make sure that, on balance, they have a positive environmental effect and still meet people’s expectations.
